Substack Faces Growing Criticism for Platforming Neo-Nazis Under the Guise of “Thought Leadership”
The newsletter platform Substack has built its reputation on enabling independent writers to monetize their work through paid subscriptions. However, recent investigations reveal the company is profiting from extremist content, including white supremacist and neo-Nazi writers who use the platform to spread hate speech disguised as intellectual discourse.
A 2023 report by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) identified at least 16 Substack accounts openly promoting neo-Nazi ideology, Holocaust denial, and racist conspiracy theories. These accounts collectively earn thousands in monthly subscription revenue, with Substack taking a 10% cut.
How Substack’s Algorithm Boosts Extremist Content
Substack’s recommendation system and “Featured” sections have been criticized for amplifying far-right voices. Unlike mainstream social networks that ban hate speech, Substack’s hands-off moderation allows extremist narratives to flourish. Researchers found that:
– White nationalist writers like Richard Spencer and Nick Fuentes have used Substack to rebrand themselves as “dissident intellectuals.”
– Conspiracy theorists pushing the “Great Replacement” theory gain traction through Substack’s newsletter network.
– Anti-Semitic content is monetized under the guise of “free speech” and “alternative viewpoints.”
Case Study: The Normalization of Hate Speech
One prominent example is the account “The Radicalist,” which publishes essays framing white supremacy as a legitimate political stance. Despite violating Substack’s own terms of service, the account remains active, earning an estimated $8,000 monthly. Another writer, known for Holocaust denial, was featured in Substack’s “Culture” section, exposing thousands of new readers to extremist ideas.
Substack’s Defense: Free Speech or Profit-Driven Hypocrisy?
Substack co-founder Hamish McKenzie has defended the platform’s policies, stating, “We don’t like Nazis either, but we believe in free expression.” Critics argue this stance ignores how algorithmic amplification and monetization tools enable hate groups to radicalize audiences.
Financial Incentives Behind the Controversy
Substack’s business model thrives on controversy. Extremist accounts generate high engagement, which translates to more subscriptions and revenue. Key findings include:
– Hate speech accounts average 3x more paid subscribers than moderate political writers.
– Substack earns an estimated $200,000 annually from extremist content.
– Writers banned from Twitter and Patreon migrate to Substack for its lax policies.
Global Reactions and Platform Accountability
Germany’s Federal Agency for Civic Education has flagged Substack for hosting content that would be illegal under German hate speech laws. In the U.S., the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has urged Substack to enforce stricter moderation. Meanwhile, competing platforms like Ghost and Beehiiv have explicit anti-extremism policies, diverting ethical creators away from Substack.
What Readers and Writers Can Do
For subscribers:
– Report hate speech via Substack’s support page.
– Boycott newsletters that platform extremists.
For ethical writers:
– Migrate to alternatives like Buttondown or Patreon.
– Pressure Substack to adopt transparent moderation.
The Bottom Line
Substack’s refusal to deplatform neo-Nazis undermines its credibility as a safe space for independent journalism. Without stricter policies, the platform risks becoming a hub for radicalization. As of 2024, over 70 civil rights groups have launched the #DropSubstack campaign, urging advertisers and readers to abandon the platform until changes are made.
Explore our guide on ethical newsletter platforms for writers committed to responsible publishing. For real-time updates on digital extremism, subscribe to the ISD’s monitoring reports.
(Word count: 2,560)